Apple vs Samsung: Tim Cook less offensive than Steve Jobs?

apsung-1.jpgUnless you live
For several years in a cave, you undoubtedly know
thatApple and Samsung compete in several
judicial battles
. Reuters returns to the subject with an article that
seems to indicate thatThe current Apple CEO was not really ready
For this battle
.

At the time Steve Jobs was in charge and found the smartphones of
Samsung far too close to his own. Tim Cook who wanted to preserve the
Supplier relations with Samsung was more reserved:

Worried about the relationship with one of the main suppliers, Tim Cook would have
Obviously preferred to manage this differently. But Steve Jobs saw things
from another angle and suspected Samsung to consider itself protected thanks
to this strong commercial relationship.

Obviously, Steve Jobs had nothing to do with moods of Tim Cook and A
finally decided to attack Samsung after attempts to
negotiation.

cookjobs-2.jpg

Since then, we know the story (not yet his outcome, however) and the
relations between the two companies have deteriorated. Apple started to
replace Samsung for many of the components of the iPhone and iPad, but
rest when
even very dependent on the giant.

Even ifThe trial of
This summer turned to Apple's advantage
, the Cupertino firm did not succeed
To go to the end and to ban Samsung products.

There remains a question, why does this 'information' come out now or this
Confrontation does not specially make the news? Should we see a
appeasement signal sent by Apple or did Reuters suddenly had
Access to a source close to the two men. Odd …

In any case, it should not be surprised if an amicable agreement is announced
Suddenly if actually Tim Cook is more reserved than Steve Jobs was
On the subject. But when?


source

i-nfo.fr - App officielle iPhon.fr

i-nfo.fr - Iphon.fr official app

Equal: AG Tescience